This post discusses the work done restoring a Beomaster 2400 (Type 2902) for a customer located in Minnesota.
This shows the fully restored unit:
Let's see what was required to get it to this point:
This image shows the receiver as it was received. Fortunately, it was packed very securely, so it suffered no damage during shipping:
This image shows the unit in its 'service position' on top of my Lazy Susan:
Utilizing a rotating assembly platform is highly recommended when performing work on these vintage Beomasters, as it drastically reduces the likelihood of stressing or breaking internal wiring leads while servicing the main board. Here is a closer perspective of the main PCB in its original state:
Then I replaced the capacitor in the remote control receiver shield. The next 'special' capacitor replacement task was replacing the four (green) capacitors on the small piggybacked board above the volume control LDR assembly:
This shows the new unit in place:
First, I tackled the program selection display board. Here it is in its factory original state after removal of the plastic filter assembly. The 10 LED replacement boards are positioned below the board:
I desoldered all of the original bulbs and populated the board with the new LED modules:
The inclusion of these specialized matching circuits is vital because the unique cold-to-hot resistance curve of a traditional bulb filament is used as an active component within the circuit design. For instance, the Beomaster 2400 leverages this specific behavior of the display bulb resistance to momentarily trigger the muting circuit whenever a source button is depressed, ensuring that no audible switching pops reach your speakers. My custom LED modules implement a network of capacitors and diodes to replicate this transient behavior, maintaining full compatibility with the circuit design.
Once the new LED modules were securely soldered into position, I carefully snapped the circuit board back into the plastic cover
The next phase required swapping out the three illumination bulbs located inside the horizontal slider scale assembly:
I installed the LED boards:
With all the LED modules in place, I powered up the Beomaster to do some adjustments. First came the 15-volt rail:
Next came the calibration of the tuning voltage:
I also built myself a second 8 Ohm dummy load, enabling simultaneous Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) measurements on both channels under load. This shows my setup:
For the THD measurements, I injected a 1 kHz reference signal at 0 dB (corresponding to an amplitude of 2.83Vpp) directly into the tape input from my signal generator. I then powered on the Beomaster and brought the volume up to a level just before the onset of clipping. This captures the resulting signal monitored across the 8-ohm dummy load resistors:
Nice, clean sine waves for both channels! Typically, visible waveform clipping on these units starts at around 40 Vpp output signal.
The QA403 inputs were hooked up to the dummy loads for this measurement. I integrated 100:1 voltage dividers into the dummy loads, effectively reducing the voltage at the QA403 inputs by 40dBV. This allows measurements without using the QA403 internal input attenuators. There is an issue with the attenuators since they introduce THD and cause measurement errors.
The QA403-native THD measurements came out to 0.13% for the left channel and 0.12% for the right channel. These values are confirmed by my own THD evaluation based on the measured FFT spectra measured by the QA403 analyzer:
My QA403 control code automatically generates a 'first order' THD value based on the first harmonic peaks of both channels. The values were 0.07% for the left and 0.06% for the right channels. These values are lower than the QA403 values since the QA403 software adds up all of the harmonic peaks and not only the first one, like I did. I think it is always a good idea to try to confirm 'black box' measurement values by assessing the actual raw data.
These numbers align well with the original factory specification of "<0.2%" detailed in the official service literature. Excellent! After letting the unit 'cook' for roughly 30 minutes at the above load, the heatsinks stabilized around 55 °C, which is normal for this architecture. This Beomaster operates properly at high output! I used my iPhone IR camera attachment to take this picture of the heat signature:
Following the THD measurements, I measured the Frequency Response (FR) of the amplifier. This shows my setup:
For my FR measurements, the QA403 inputs were connected to Test Points (TP) 203 and 303. First, I measured the FR via the tape input. My control software measured 10 spectra and averaged them. This is what I got:
For my second FR measurement, I connected the QA403 outputs to the phono input of the Beomaster. This measurement aimed to see whether the RIAA preamplifier had the proper de-emphasis. Due to the 100x (40dBV) higher sensitivity of phono inputs relative to high-level inputs like the tape input, I constructed a special cable with a 100:1 voltage divider integrated so the QA403 outputs would not overwhelm the input. This is the curve I measured:
These measurements demonstrated that this Beomaster 2400 is ready for duty again!
Time to begin reassembly of the enclosure! First, I removed all oxidation from the contact tabs of the touch buttons:
The Beomaster had lost all four plastic feet:
I will run this restored Beomaster 2400 for a few days to verify long-term stability, after which it will be ready to return to its owner in Minnesota!